The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Case regulation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, website if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based about the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling to the same kind of case.
Summaries deliver an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and procedures aimed at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government insurance policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to while in the state court, for the same level.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more